Satyagraha

Cultural Psychology

Why Vote Third-Party?

with 12 comments

thomas_jeffersonSee TJ’s Great Books List!

[An updated version of “Why Vote Third-Party?” is here on my main website. (April 2015)]

FOR busier readers, here is the argument in outline form. The original article, slightly longer, follows. After that are links of interest.

  • Today we effectively have a staged elections, in which the Establishment (a.k.a. the System, the power elite, the military-industrial-banking-oil-media-complex), presents two status quo candidates.
  • To prevent voters from voting for a third-party candidate, the Establishment uses a divide-and-conquer strategy: (1) choose Republican/Democrat platform issues that polarize voter opinion as closely as possible to a 50/50 split; (2) have horrible, frightening candidates for both parties; (3) by this means, manipulate voters such that, to keep the more feared candidate from winning, they must vote for the other candidate; (4) crucial to this strategy’s success is to emphasize hot-button issues to scare voters on both left and right and for news media to maximally inflame emotions.
  • As a result, virtually everyone (98% in the 2012 presidential election) votes for the Democrat or Republican candidate, maintaining the Establishment power elite. Nothing changes: wars, poverty, bad economy, no jobs, poor quality of life, continued erosion of values and morale. Wealth transfer continues from citizens to corporate owners.
  • Nomination of horrible Republican and Democrat candidates also means many voters will simply not vote, which again works in the Establishment’s favor.
  • The racket will continue as long as it works; it will stop working when a substantial proportion of Americans vote for independent or third-party candidates.
  • Voting for the Democrat or Republican candidate cannot be justified on the principle of choosing the lesser evil. Regardless of which mainstream candidate is elected, the short-term (say, 4 to 6 years) outcome will be more or less the same. Nothing much will change as long as the two big parties, and the same Establishment interests they represent, control our country. But voting for independent or third-party candidates now will potentially hasten the arrival of a time — perhaps 10–20 years hence — when we do have a real choice, and real issues. Thus, the genuine ‘lesser evil’ choice is to vote for a non-Establishment, even though one knows that the candidate won’t be elected.
  • Voting for an independent or third-party candidate, therefore, will not throw your vote away. It will make a definite statement, both to the Republican and Democratic parties, and to your fellow citizens.
  • Even though they represent the same vested interests, there is enough rivalry between the Democratic and Republican parties that, if third parties receive a sufficient proportion of the vote, they will begin to modify their platforms, making more concessions to citizens.
  • Further, voting for third-party presidential candidates will help third parties reach the critical threshold of 5% of the popular vote — at which point they will qualify for public campaign funding assistance.

Every nation gets the government it deserves. ~ Joseph de Maistre

Deserve better! Resist demagogy! Fight back!


 Why Vote Third-Party

See the 2012 Third Party Presidential Debate Here!

My goal here is to convince you of sound reasons to vote for a third-party candidate — ANY third-party candidate — in the presidential election.

The reasoning is simple:

First, it should be evident to all that the Democratic and Republican parties are ‘in cahoots’. There’s not much real difference between them. Together they form a duopoly with absolute political and economic power. They distract public attention by arguing about superficial differences, obscuring the fact that they agree on the major issues like:

  • the BIG GOVERNMENT model is the only option
  • America needs a huge military budget
  • war is not insane
  • no term limits
  • the ‘war on drugs’

Then why not just vote third-party? Here’s the reason many people give: “If I vote for a third party, wouldn’t that throw my vote away?“.

Let’s dispel that myth once and for all. First, if one thing is plain, it’s that you have thrown your vote away if you vote for the Democrat or Republican candidate. The two parties are basically the same, and regardless of which party is in power, things don’t improve. Recall that it was both the Democrats and the Republicans who rushed into the Iraq war, waving the flag, without a plan.

The truth is, the Republicrat duopoly has arranged so that we have a Democrat for one or two terms, then a Republican, and then back again. It’s a sweet system where both parties win. Neither is out of power for very long.

Consider also how both parties together have succeeded in making you feel you have to vote against someone. In 2000, for example, you may not have liked Bush much, but felt you needed to vote against Al Gore, or vice versa. That, I propose, is precisely what the two parties want. They have, by picking the right issues, managed to completely polarize the American public into two camps, split almost 50/50. Further, they’ve set the tone of American politics as one of constant acrimony and argument. Far too much attention is spent criticizing the other camp, and not enough on presenting new, positive ideas. It’s a divide and conquer strategy. By polarizing the American public, the Republicrat power coalition has kept people too busy fighting with each other to see what the real problem is. It’s the old case of ‘let’s you and him fight’.

This makes each person think, “My vote is essential to prevent the other party from winning; I can’t afford to vote for a third-party candidate, or someone with original ideas.” But considering the dearth of good ideas among the current Republican and Democrat candidates, it’s evident that, whichever wins, we’ll be stuck with another bad president for at least another four years.

This November, then, you’ll have two choices:

1. Vote for the Democrat or Republican candidate, in which case you truly will throw your vote away, or
2. Vote for a third party candidate.

In the second case, it’s true your candidate will not likely win. But you haven’t thrown your vote away. If enough people do this, then the Democrats and Republicans will get the message. By the time the next elections come around, they will be thinking about adopting some of the ideas from the third parties. Further, any vote for a third party encourages the founding of new third parties, with valuable new ideas.

The potential for positive change in America exists. What we must do is create a climate in which these ideas will come to the fore in public discussion, and find implementation as social policy. Third parties can meet this vital need.

Therefore, here are two suggestions for you to consider:

1. Investigate the current third party candidates. Read their platforms and identify any promising ideas they have. In just doing this you will have broken free from the mind-conditioning of the two-party system. You will be actively contributing to making American a true democracy. Then, just consider voting for the candidate whom you would like to be president, not worrying about the issue of ‘throwing your vote away.’

2. Most of all — though this is really a separate issue — approach the election with a positive attitude. This shouldn’t be about whom you dislike or disagree with. It should be about developing positive vision of the future. Pay particular attention to noticing how the big-party candidates (and their buddies, the news media) try to manipulate public consciousness by eliciting anger and hatred — and then don’t oblige them.

Be the change you want see in the world!


Links

My Articles

Other Contemporary Articles

Historical

Resources

Third Party Websites

12 Responses

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. […] And if you haven’t already seen it, here is my article:  Why Vote Third Party? […]

  2. Very well said!

    The actions of the two maor candidates regarding the bailout scheme support your comments, too. Both McCain and Obama voted for this bailout plan, along with a majority of representatives from both parties (excepting a few mavericks like Kucinich and Feingold).

    Kimchi

    October 3, 2008 at 8:21 pm

  3. […] Barr 2008 Why Vote Third-party? My goal here is to convince you to vote for a third-party candidate — ANY third-party candidate […]

  4. […] office, and America as a whole knows that. So your argument is now void. Maybe you should give this a read. […]

  5. Well done, friend. Your posts do not go unnoticed. You should consider submitting a condensed version of this article to some local newspapers, or at least going to their online versions, quickly opening an account, and posting it there as well.

    zerostomia

    October 19, 2008 at 3:29 am

  6. […] Why Vote Third-Party? […]

    California dreamer

    October 8, 2010 at 2:22 pm

  7. […] post:  Why Vote Third-Party? Like this:LikeBe the first to like this […]

  8. Thanks so much for this! I share nearly all of your views and will spread this to my liberal friends who are on the cusp of waking up!

    fatgayguy

    October 15, 2012 at 8:41 pm

  9. […] against the machine” – that right there should convince them to check it out)  Also, this post does a pretty good job helping third-partiers defend their choice – they need SOME answer to […]

  10. […] Uebersax, John. S. ‘Why Vote Third-Party?’. […]

  11. Well said… I believe everything was well put together as well as the reasons why we should vote 3rd party and how to do so. Only one thing i don’t agree on is the way the country would let a republican run for 2 years and a democrat run for 2 years because that wouldn’t work. there is no such thing as both sides win in politics, its either a, b, or c. Although i feel this way, i was pleased with the ways to get a 3rd party candidate elected when both the republicans and democrats have horrible representatives.

    Dominic Alberini

    January 16, 2018 at 11:25 pm


Leave a comment